Who Controls the World?
Without #FreeSpeech the #people have lost.
Azulejo painted ceramic tiles in Portuguese city
Photo by ArtHouse Studio: https://www.pexels.com/photo/azulejo-painted-ceramic-tiles-in-portuguese-city-4330050
Blog of Christian philosopher and author C.W. Steinle: encouragements, profundities, observations, and sharing. May or may not have something to do with my books.
Azulejo painted ceramic tiles in Portuguese city
Photo by ArtHouse Studio: https://www.pexels.com/photo/azulejo-painted-ceramic-tiles-in-portuguese-city-4330050
Did you know that world leaders quoted the Bible to promote national Israel?
Ignatius of Antiochie, Neapolitan School of Painting, possibly Cesare Fracanzano (1605-1651) Galleria Borghese, Rome
Excerpts from THE FORGOTTEN AGE OF JUDAH: The Untold Story of Grace in the Second Temple Period, By Dr. Douglas Hamp, Chris Winters Steinle, Copyright 2021 by the Commonwealth of Israel Foundation, Phoenix, USA, Published by the Commonwealth of Israel Foundation. From Chapter 8: Antioch and Hellenistic Judaism
The Antiochian/Hellenistic (anti-Semitic) stance toward the
Law was codified by the Church in the early part of the second century through
the letters of Ignatius, the bishop of Antioch. It should be noted that around
this same time, the heretic, Marcion, was also involved in the task of proving
that Christianity and Judaism—grace and law—were mutually exclusive, and that
they do not even proceed from the same deity. Dr. Hamp has written extensively
on Marcionism’s continued detrimental effects on Christianity, despite the fact
that Marcion was labeled a heretic by the Church![1]
Ignatius, on the other hand, was sainted as a Christian martyr and his
letters—practically canonized. The proclamations of Ignatius, who was
considered to be one of the Apostolic Fathers, form the basis of what should
properly be called, “Hellenistic Christianity.”
[1]
For further study see: Haunted Theology
and the Ghost of Marcion by Dr. Douglas Hamp.
Ignatius
was a bishop of Antioch, said to be appointed by Peter and according to
tradition was the successor to Evodius. Tradition also holds that Ignatius was
a friend of Polycarp and that both young men had been disciples of John the
Apostle. It is also supposed that Ignatius was one of the children Jesus took
in His arms and blessed. Add, then, to these accolades a martyr’s death and it
is obvious why so much weight was placed on the opinions of Ignatius. Quotes
from the letters written by Ignatius while purportedly being extradited to Rome
for execution are presented below, followed by commentary.
Ignatius to the
Magnesians, Ch. 8[1]:
1 Be not seduced by strange doctrines nor
by antiquated fables, which are profitless.
For if even unto this day we live after
the manner of Judaism, we avow that we have not received grace:
2 for the divine prophets lived after
Christ Jesus. For this cause also they were persecuted, being inspired by His
grace to the end that they which are disobedient might be fully persuaded that
there is one God who manifested Himself through Jesus Christ His Son, who is
His Word that proceeded from silence, who in all things was well-pleasing unto
Him that sent Him.
Verse 1 clearly juxtaposes Judaism with grace, implying that
traditional Judaism—keeping the Law—is prima facia evidence that an individual
has not received (saving) grace. Verse 2 begins by stating that the prophets
lived (after the manner) of Jesus, that is by grace rather than by obedience to
the Law. This is simply absurd on several levels. First, Jesus obeyed the Law
to the extent that He could ask: “Which of you convicts Me of sin?” (Jn. 8:46).
Furthermore, the prophets kept the law themselves. Secondly, Ignatius redirects
“obedience” away from meaning “obedience to the Law” and defines the meaning of
obedience as the belief that there is only one God—the very ploy of the
Hellenistic Jews. Verse 2 ends with a true statement—that the Son was
well-pleasing to the Father. But ending these phrases with a true statement
does not somehow make the rest of the content true.
Ignatius to the
Magnesians, Ch. 9
1 If then those who had walked in ancient
practices attained unto newness of hope, no longer observing sabbaths but
fashioning their lives after the Lord’s day, on which our life also arose
through Him and through His death which some men deny – a mystery whereby we
attained unto belief, and for this cause we endure patiently, that we may be
found disciples of Jesus Christ our only teacher --
2 if this be so, how shall we be able to
live apart from Him? seeing that even the prophets, being His disciples, were
expecting Him as their teacher through the Spirit. And for this cause He whom
they rightly awaited, when He came, raised them from the dead.
These are some mighty big “ifs.” The assumption presented by
Ignatius is that because God’s “ancient” Elect were looking forward to
participating in Christ’s resurrection, they therefore, to that extent, were
“no longer observing sabbaths.” He thereby implies that the saints of old were,
at least, disobedient to the Law in their hearts. Seriously? Yet the Church did
take this notion seriously. Moreover, Ignatius imposed this hypothetical on his
hearers by threatening that those who wish to participate in the life of Christ
must, likewise, forsake the sabbath and honor “the Lord’s day.”
At this point we should wonder: To what degree had the
Antiochian Hellenist already ceased to comply with the third commandment? This
doctrinal position seems to roll off the tongue at the beginning of the second
century—perhaps shortly after John’s death. It is far more likely that the
Hellenized Church did not fall far from the tree of the Hellenistic Jewish
community. The whole gist of Hellenism was, after all, adapting to the customs
of the international community. As observed by historian Emil Schürer: “They
who then wanted to affect anything in the political world must of necessity
stand on a more or less friendly footing with Hellenism.”[2]
Ignatius to the
Magnesians, Ch. 10
1 Therefore let us not be insensible to His
goodness. For if He should imitate us according to our deeds, we are lost. For
this cause, seeing that we are become His disciples, let us learn to live as
beseemeth Christianity. For whoso is called by another name besides this, is
not of God.
Here we must interject between stanzas what is implied by
Ignatius, but not stated outright—that those who are called “Jews” instead of
“Christians” would not be “of God.”
2 Therefore put away the vile leaven
which hath waxed stale and sour, and betake yourselves to the new leaven, which
is Jesus Christ. Be ye salted in Him, that none among you grow putrid, seeing
that by your savour ye shall be proved.
3 It is monstrous to talk of Jesus Christ
and to practise Judaism. For Christianity did not believe in Judaism, but
Judaism in Christianity, wherein every tongue believed and was gathered
together unto God.
Verse 3 begins by making it an abomination to speak of
Messiah (who is the Lord—Acts 2:36) and, at the same time, to follow the Lord’s
instructions. Whereas, the inverse of this statement is actually true. It is
monstrous to speak of Jesus Christ while not obeying His commandments.
Next, Ignatius anthropomorphizes Judaism and Christianity
and asserts, “Christianity did not believe in Judaism.” On the contrary, in
Paul’s own words: “But this I confess to you, that according to the Way which
they call a sect, so I worship the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the Law and in the Prophets”
(Acts 24:14, emphasis added). Indeed, Christian salvation is attained by the
confession that Jesus is the same “LORD”—Gr.
“Kurios”—of the Old Testament (Acts 10:9-10). Therefore, Christians believed in
the Holy One of Israel and Jews continued to believe in the Holy One of Israel.
And certainly, the words of the Lord are the final authority on this doctrine:
“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the
Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say
to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means
pass from the law till all is fulfilled. Whoever therefore breaks one of the
least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the
kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great
in the kingdom of heaven. For I say to you, that unless your righteousness
exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means
enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 5:17-20).
Jesus’ only criticism of the Jews of His day concerning
obedience to the Law was that it should be carried out with the love of God,
and not neglect or replace the love of God.
Ignatius’ blatantly blind and baseless antagonism toward the
Jews stemmed from nothing, more nor less, than from the Hellenistic
determination that Jewish Traditionalism opposed the will of God; while the
Hellenistic—watered down, so to speak—approach to obeying God’s laws was the
ordained method that should be adopted by the Church.
Judah’s internal strife during the Second Temple period was
simply the result of the God-fearing Jews’ apprehension that further exile
could only be avoided by obeying God’s laws. From the “Set Apart”—who became
the Pharisees, to the Traditionalists, and finally, the Zealots, all of these
movements were established to promote the pure observance and practice of God’s
precepts. The Hellenists had determined that God’s laws were a burden, and had
preferred, rather, to mingle with nations. In most cases, international forces
were brought into the three major conflicts listed above by those who opposed
the religious purists. And, in turn, the liberal factions compromised their
faith by bending to the norms of the current world empire; be it Persian,
Greek, Syrian, or Roman.
The following quotations should be self-explanatory. These
precious early writings prove that the Apostles and their immediate
appointees—the first overseers and pastors—did, in fact keep the Passover as
required by the Law of God. Yes, the Early Church, not just in Judea but in the
Asian churches of modern day Turkey, kept the Law.Emphasis added.
Eusebius, Church History, Book V.
Chapter
23. The Question then agitated concerning the Passover.
1. A question of no small importance arose at that
time. For the parishes of all Asia, as from an older tradition, held that the
fourteenth day of the moon, on which day the Jews were commanded to sacrifice
the lamb, should be observed as the feast of the Saviour’s Passover. It was
therefore necessary to end their fast on that day, whatever day of the week it
should happen to be.
Chapter
24:
1. But the bishops of Asia, led by
Polycrates, decided to hold to the old custom handed down to them. He himself, in a letter which he addressed to
Victor and the church of Rome, set forth in the following words the tradition
which had come down to him:
2. We
observe the exact day; neither adding, nor taking away. For in Asia also great lights have fallen asleep, which
shall rise again on the day of the Lord’s coming, when he shall come with glory
from heaven, and shall seek out all the saints. Among these are Philip, one of the twelve apostles, who fell asleep
in Hierapolis; and his two aged virgin daughters, and another daughter, who
lived in the Holy Spirit and now rests at Ephesus; and, moreover, John, who was both a witness and a
teacher, who reclined upon the bosom of the Lord, and, being a priest, wore the
sacerdotal plate.
3. He fell asleep at Ephesus.
4. And Polycarp in Smyrna, who was a bishop and martyr...
6. All
these observed the fourteenth day of the passover according to the Gospel,
deviating in no respect, but following the rule of faith. And I also, Polycrates, the least of you all, do
according to the tradition of my relatives, some of whom I have closely
followed. For seven of my relatives were bishops; and I am the eighth. And my
relatives always observed the day when the people put away the leaven.
7. I, therefore, brethren, who have lived
sixty-five years in the Lord, and have met with the brethren throughout the world, and have gone through every Holy Scripture, am not affrighted by terrifying
words. For those greater than I have said ‘We ought to obey God rather than
man.’ Acts 5:29
From Against
Heresies, Book III, Ch. 2:4:
Polycarp also was not only instructed by apostles, and conversed with many who had seen Christ, but was also, by apostles in Asia, appointed bishop of the Church in Smyrna, whom I [Irenaeus] also saw in my early youth, for he tarried [on earth] a very long time, and, when a very old man, gloriously and most nobly suffering martyrdom, departed this life, having always taught the things which he had learned from the apostles, and which the Church has handed down, and which alone are true. To these things all the Asiatic Churches testify, as do also those men who have succeeded Polycarp down to the present time. CONTINUE READING The Forgotten Age of Judah at Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08PJ2JTYF
Series: Reagan White House Photographs, 1/20/1981 - 1/20/1989Collection: White House Photographic Collection, 1/20/1981 - 1/20/1989, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons |
The New World Order in
Antiquity: A 4,000-year history
Two-headed eagle on sphinx located at the right of the Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük, Turkey.
Excerpts
from THE
FORGOTTEN AGE OF JUDAH: The Untold Story of Grace in the Second Temple Period,
By Dr. Douglas Hamp, Chris Winters Steinle
Copyright 2021 by the
Commonwealth of Israel Foundation, Phoenix, USA
Published
by the Commonwealth of Israel Foundation.
Chapter
7: Collusion and the Judgment of Nations
Over the last 50 years, much attention has been focused on
identifying the hidden powers that are expected to emerge as the One-World
Government of the antichrist. There is, in fact, abundant evidence that the
wealthy men of the world do hold sway over the course of world affairs. This is
only to be expected, as asserted by James: “Do not the rich oppress you and
drag you into the courts? Do they not blaspheme that noble name by which you
are called?” (James 2:6-7). Certainly, the Hapsburgs Dynasty did go underground
around the time that democracy was proposed in Europe and America. But if these
royal families did go broke, as purported, why do we still find them
represented at such high-level meetings as the Bilderberger’s gatherings?
Despite the reality that social and political policy appears
to the everyday observer to be pushed down from above, rather than rising from
the populous, responses like the article below seem to be intended to quash any
serious investigation into the existence of any such “world-ruling” body.
If you were really a member of the global élite,
you’d know this already: the world is ruled by a powerful, secretive few. Many
of the rest of us peons have heard that in 2004 both candidates for the White
House were members of Yale University’s secretive Skull and Bones society, many
of whose members have risen to powerful positions. But Skull and Bones is small
potatoes compared with the mysterious cabals that occupy virtually every seat
of power, from the corridors of government to the boardrooms of Wall Street.
Take the Illuminati, a sect said to have originated
in 18th century Germany; and which is allegedly responsible for the
pyramid-and-eye symbol adorning the $1 bill: they intend to foment world wars
to strengthen the argument for the creation of a worldwide government (which would
of course be Satanic in nature). Or consider the Freemasons, who tout their
group as the “oldest and largest worldwide fraternity” and boast alumni like
George Washington. Some think that despite donating heaps of cash to charity,
they are secretly plotting your undoing at Masonic temples across the world. Or
maybe, some theorize, the guys pulling the strings aren’t concealed in shadow
at all. They might be the intelligentsia on the Council on Foreign Relations, a
cadre of policy wonks who allegedly count their aims as publishing an erudite
bimonthly journal and establishing a unified world government—not necessarily
in that order.[1]
Some conspiracy theorists believe the secret elite will
become so powerful, so confident, that in the end they will walk brazenly
across the world stage in plain view. But what if these secret powers have
never been secret at all—but well known and open to view? There was a time,
however, when it was easier to expose the Kingdom of Man, in contrast to the
Kingdom of God—represented on earth as His Elect, the people of God. Today,
many nations around the world “identify” as the people of God. But 2,000 years
ago, this was not the case.
At the close of the Second Temple Period, when it was
apparent that yet another empire—this time the Roman Empire—was on the verge of
taking Israel captive all over again, the Jewish sages were emboldened to
identify the Kingdom of Man, once and for all.
Pertinent citations from 4 Ezra Chapter 11 and The
Assumption of Moses, Section 10 are presented below without comment. The
objects within these visions/analogies will become clear as this chapter
develops.
The Eagle and the Lion—4th Ezra/2 Esdras
2 Esdras 11, Common English Bible (CEB):
The Vision of the Eagle
1 On the second night I had a dream. I
saw an eagle, with twelve feathered wings and three heads, rising up from the
sea. 2 As I looked, it spread its wings over the whole earth, and all the winds
of heaven blew toward it, and the clouds gathered around it. 3 Out of its wings
grew opposing wings. These became small, tiny wings. 4 Its heads were at rest.
The middle head was larger than the other heads, but it was also at rest with
them.
5 I kept looking and saw the eagle flying
with its wings to rule over the earth and over those who lived on the earth. 6
I saw how everything under heaven was made to submit to it, and no one opposed
it, not a single creature that lives on the earth... (Verses 7-32 proceed to
depict the interactions of various wings and heads—omitted here because they
aren’t necessary for understanding the symbology of these “bird”
representations).
The Vision of the Eagle and the Lion
33 After all this, I watched as the middle head,
just like the wings, suddenly disappeared. 34 There were two heads left,
however, which also ruled over the earth and over those who live on it. 35 I
looked and watched as the head on the right side devoured the one on the left.
36 I heard a voice saying to me, “Look in front of you and consider what you
see.” 37 I looked and saw something like a lion being roused, roaring out of
the forest. I heard how he spoke in a human voice and said to the eagle, 38
“Listen, you, and I will speak to you. The Most High says to you, 39 ‘Aren’t
you the last of the four beasts that I made to rule in my world so that I might
bring about the end of my times through them? 40 You, the fourth that has come,
conquered all the beasts that came before you, ruling over the world with much
terror and over the whole world with harsh oppression. You have lived in the
world with deceit for so long! 41 You judged the earth, but not in truth, 42
for you have oppressed the meek and injured those who caused no unrest. You
hated those who spoke the truth and loved liars. You destroyed the dwellings of
those who bore fruit and tore down the walls of those who had done you no harm.
43 Your insolence has ascended to the Most High and your pride to the mighty
one. 44 The Most High has reviewed his times. Look! They are finished, and his
ages are complete. 45 Therefore, eagle, you must utterly vanish, you and your
terrifying wings, your dreadful little wings and your evil heads, and your
dreadful talons and all your worthless body. 46 Then the whole earth will be
refreshed and restored, set free from your violence, and will hope for the
judgment and mercy of him who made it.’”
The Eagle and Israel—Assumption of Moses
The Assumption of Moses, Section 10.
The Church Fathers Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and
Didymus believed that Jude 9 was quoted from The Assumption of Moses. The
translation below fills in some undecipherable text, rather than skipping the
omitted characters in the manner of other translations.[2]
7. For the Most High will arise, the
Eternal God alone,
And He will appear to punish the
Gentiles,
And He will destroy all their idols.
8. Then thou, O Israel, wilt be happy,
And thou wilt mount upon the neck[s and
wings] of the eagle,
And (the days of thy mourning) will be
ended.
9. And God will exalt thee,
And He will cause thee to approach to
the heaven of the stars,
And He will establish thy habitation
among them.
10. And thou wilt look from on high and
wilt see thy enemies in Ge(henna),
And thou wilt recognise them and
rejoice,
And thou wilt give thanks and confess thy
Creator.
By taking these two early Jewish
writings together, we can easily deduce that the “Lion” in 4 Ezra 11 is
analogous to “Israel” in The Assumption of Moses Sec. 10. However, in both
passages the enemy of God’s people is represented with allusions to birds: the
headed pairs of wings in Ezra, and the eagle—with necks and wings—in The
Assumption. So, who or what do these birds symbolize? This question is not
difficult to answer; all the necessary information is provided by studying World
History. From the onset of the Age of Man, birds were the primary focus of
worship.
Figure 1The Vulture Stone at Göbekli Tepe.
Göbekli Tepe is a c. 12,000-year-old archaeological site in Anatolia,
Turkey. The deepest and oldest Layer III is also the most sophisticated with
enclosures characterized by different thematic components and artistic
representations. Pillar no. 43, the “Vulture Stone,” is shown in Figure 12
above. On the left-hand side, a vulture is holding an orb or egg in an
outstretched wing.[3]
The older parts of the ancient tell may be more reliably
dated to circa 9,000 B.C. For those readers who hold to a roughly
6,000-year-old “new earth” creation position, just appreciate that Göbekli Tepe
is considered to be the oldest known site of worship on earth. To “secular”
scientists, and those who favor the theory of a recently inhabited old earth,
this site is placed on the timeline just at the close of the last Ice Age. The
important thing to observe within the scope of our study is the display of
various birds. Although the vulture is the predominant figure, the Ibis or
Crane is easily visible—up and to the right of the vulture and egg. What we
behold before our eyes is a real-life example of symbols of worship made like “birds
and four-footed animals and creeping things” (Rom. 1:23). And do take notice
that Paul begins his list with birds.
Supporting our thesis that the large birds, or birds of
prey, were to become the emblems of the Kingdom of Man during this Age, we
submit the “prehistoric” archaeological chamber known as the “Cave of the
Birds,” located just below the surface of the Giza plateau. This location begs
the question: Were the pyramids built at this ceremonial site of worship based
on the importance of the Tomb of the Birds?
Figure 2 CollinsA2-Gizas
Tomb of the Birds
The explorer and discoverer of the caves was unable to carry
out research on the content of the tunnel, being interrupted indefinitely by
Egyptian authorities. Below are his initial findings. His expectation, however,
regarding the Ibis turned out to be correct.
Identifying what type of birds were interred might
well provide some clue as to how the ancient Egyptians viewed the entrance to
Giza’s cave world. My money would be on the birds being either ibises,
indicative of the cult of Thoth (the Greek Hermes), or falcons, suggestive of
the cult of Horus or more intriguingly that of Sokar, the guardian of the
Memphite necropolis in its role as the Fifth Hour of the duat-underworld as
portrayed in the Am-duat funerary text. Other bird types might include the
vulture, indicative of the cult of Mut; the goose, the totem of the earth-god
Geb, the eagle, examples of which were found recently in a new tomb discovered
at Saqqara, or even the crane, which might hint at a very archaic cult indeed.[4]
More than 4 million sacred ibis mummies have been
found in the catacombs of Tuna el-Gebel and 1.75 million have been discovered
in the ancient burial ground of Saqqara. The vast majority were votive
offerings to the god Thoth, a practice that had its heyday between 450BC and
250BC.[5]
The significance of the Ibis becomes clear when it is
understood that the Ibis was central to an Egyptian creation story—a story that
wholly contradicts the biblical account. The Ibis, therefore, became a symbol
of the Egyptian religion. But the bird symbol was also one of the oldest carvings
found on Hittite and Mesopotamian reliefs. Over the course of the next several
millennia, the symbol of the bird took on the meaning that is ascribed to it
today—the attributes of “kingdom” and “authority.” The winged sun or winged
disk was a symbol of worship when it first began to be used; but by the time of
Judah’s King Hezekiah, the winged disk had become synonymous with kingship.
Figure 4 Benben
stone from the Pyramid of Amenemhat III, Twelfth Dynasty. Egyptian Museum,
Cairo. Copyright free image enhanced to
feature the winged disk at the top.
The Benben stone is an object that is found in the
mythology of ancient Egypt. Note the winged disk at the top of Figure 15. This
mythical stone is thought to have been part of a shrine at the temple dedicated
to the deity Atum in Heliopolis. The Benben stone is also an architectural
term, and is the name given to the tip of an obelisk or the capstone placed on
top of a pyramid. In the mythology of ancient Egypt, there are several accounts
of the creation of the world. According to this version of the creation story,
the universe was brought into being by Atum. It was believed that in the
beginning, there was nothing but darkness and chaos. It was out of the dark
waters that the primordial hill, known as the Benben arose, on top of which
stood Atum. Because the Benben rose from the primeval waters, it has been
suggested that this word is associated with the verb ‘weben’, which is the
Egyptian hieroglyph for ‘to rise’.[6]
Next, we observe that the winged disk became a prominent
icon throughout the eastern Mediterranean reaching into the Fertile Crescent.
In early Egyptian religion, the symbol Behedeti represented Horus of Edfu,
later identified with Ra-Harachte. As time passed (according to interpretation)
all of the subordinated gods of Egypt were considered to be aspects of the sun
god, including Khepri.
From roughly 2000 BC, the symbol also appears in the Levant,
Mesopotamia, and Asia Minor. It appears in reliefs with Assyrian rulers and in
Hieroglyphic Anatolian as a symbol for royalty, transcribed into Latin as SOL
SUUS (literally, “his own self, the Sun”, i.e., “His Majesty”).[7]
Figure 5 Winged-disk,
Susa, Mesopotamia
Figure 6 The seal of
Tudhaliya IV (1237–1228 B.C.) is stamped on this 4-inch-high fragment of a
letter sent to the king of Ugarit. Although the letter is written in cuneiform,
the seal is in Hittite hieroglyphics. Credit: Erich Lessing.
As early as 1900 B.C.E., an Indo-European people began to settle in what is now Turkey. By the 16th century B.C.E., they were powerful enough to invade Babylon. Their might continued to expand until they were a superpower on the level with Egypt and Assyria. The Hittites play a prominent role at key places in the Hebrew Bible: Ephron the Hittite sells Abraham the family burial ground (Genesis 23); Esau married Hittite women, and Rebecca despised them (Genesis 26:34); frequently they are listed as one of the inhabitants of Canaan (e.g., Exodus 13:5; Numbers 13:29; Joshua 11:3).[8]
L’melekh—Belonging to
the King
From ca. the 8th century BC, the winged solar disk
appears on Hebrew seals connected to the royal house of the Kingdom of Judah.
Many of these are seals and jar handles from Hezekiah’s reign, together with
the inscription l’melekh [LMLK] (“belonging to the king”).[9]
Figure 7 HEZEKIAH IN
THE BIBLE. The royal seal of Hezekiah, king of Judah, was discovered in the
Ophel excavations under the direction of archaeologist Eilat Mazar. Photo:
Courtesy of Dr. Eilat Mazar; photo by Ouria Tadmor.
The bulla (Figure 18), which measures just over a centimeter
in diameter, bears a seal impression depicting a two-winged sun disk flanked by
ankh symbols and containing a Hebrew inscription that reads “Belonging to
Hezekiah, (son of) Ahaz, king of Judah.”[10]
Figure 8 Hezekiah’s Seal
“Hezekiah Seal (Figure 19) Proves that Ancient Jerusalem was
a Major Judahite Capital.” Similar seal impressions had already been found – by
thieves. This one uniquely found in situ proves King Hezekiah’s connection to
the LMLK symbols and the existence of an advanced Judahite administration.[11]
Regrettably, the Hezekiah Seal does not just prove ancient
Jerusalem was a major Judahite capital. It also proves that the government of
Judah had already been compromised by using the symbology of the Nations—and
especially, the bird icon of Egypt and Canaan.
Leviticus 18:2-5: The Lord said to Moses, “Speak
to the Israelites and say to them: ‘I am the Lord your God. You must not do as
they do in Egypt, where you used to live, and you must not do as they do in the
land of Canaan, where I am bringing you. Do not follow their practices. You
must obey my laws and be careful to follow my decrees. I am the Lord your God.
Keep my decrees and laws, for the person who obeys them will live by them. I am
the Lord.
Although it is said that Hezekiah did what was right in the
sight of God, the God who also said not to “take their name on your lips” could
not have been pleased with the incorporation of this pagan symbol. Below is a
map showing how possessing variations of the King’s bird seal showed allegiance
to the king.
LMLK seals (with LMLK meaning ‘of the king’) are
ancient Hebrew seals stamped on the handles of large storage jars first issued
in the reign of King Hezekiah (circa 700 BC) and discovered mostly in and
around Jerusalem. The iconography of the two and four winged symbols are
representative of royal symbols whose meaning “was tailored in each kingdom to
the local religion and ideology”.[12]
Figure 9 Sites where
LMLK seals were found
This technique of making modifications to the King’s seal of
authority was eventually copied internationally. Therefore, the “secret
society” controlling world affairs has been no secret for at least the last
2,000 years. The long anticipated one-world government has indeed been in place
since the onset of the Age of Man. The Coats of Arms image below represents
merely a few of the “bird banners” used by nations all over the world. The bird
symbol is an unspoken acknowledgment of submission to the king—the Kingdom of
Man. There is simply no other way to explain why many otherwise hostile and alienated
countries would choose the same mascot.
Figure 10
Coat of Arms with Eagle.[13]
Many Jewish historians look to the reign of Herod (the
Edomite) as the point of infiltration by outsiders into Judah’s government. In
the same way, many Christians look to the reign of Constantine as the time when
the State took control of the Church. Yet, by recognizing the bird figure as
the symbol of national—and international—authority, it can be seen that the
influence of the overbearing state is more ubiquitous than could have been
initiated by one king or one emperor. Both the Eastern and Western arms of the
Christian Church had no reservations about displaying their true LMLK seals of
belonging.
Figure 12
Quaternionenadler, an eagle of the Holy Roman Empire that shows the shields of
the member states by rank (1510).
Origins of the
Double-headed Bird
Figure 13 Relief representing a two-headed eagle on the sphinx located at the right of the Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük, Turkey
The double-headed eagle motif has been used as an emblem by
countries, nations, and royal houses in Europe since the early medieval period.
Notable examples include the Byzantine House of Palaiologos, the Holy Roman
Empire, the House of Habsburg, and the Ruriks and Romanovs of Russia. The
Russian use of the double-headed eagle motif (dating from the adoption of it by
Ivan III in 1497), though iconographically modeled after the Byzantine, was
likely in imitation of the Hapsburgian.[14]
It would appear curious that regional Christian empires
would choose for their mascot the Hittite double-headed eagle. The selection of
the Hittite eagle is suspect because the “Cradle of Christianity”—Antioch of
Syria—lies within the borders of the Ancient Hittite Empire. This possible
spiritual connection will be addressed in the next chapter.
Yazılıkaya is an ancient
sanctuary that served the Hittite capital of Hattusa, located in modern-day
Boğazkale, Turkey. The region (known as the “land of Hatti”) was first
inhabited by the Hattians, around 2000 BC and was absorbed into a new Hittite
state. Hattusa was established as the capital during the 17th century BC by
King Hattusilis I. A large sanctuary, Yazılıkaya, was constructed outside the
city gates across roofless chambers formed inside a group of rock outcroppings.
The chambers depict various rock-cut reliefs portraying the gods of the Hittite
pantheon such as the sun-goddess Hebat and the storm-god Teshub, with most of
the reliefs dating from restorations by King Tudhaliya IV and king Suppiluliuma
II in the late 13th century BC.[15]
Among the reliefs is the image of the double-headed eagle,
thought to represent the deific daughter and granddaughter of the Tešub, the
storm god. Such a record of the progeny and international battles of the
“wings” is exactly what is described in the interim verses of the 4 Ezra
citation, which were omitted, at the beginning of this chapter. The artwork
from the Early Dynastic period of Early Mesopotamia has many double-headed king
figures. Figure 25 shows a double-headed winged figure with a humanoid body
(possibly representing a deity [or king]).
Figure 15
. Seal impression from Alalakh (Tell Atchana); from Assyrian Colony period
(Collon 1987:Illustration 142[17].
Cylinder seals, common in Mesopotamia, are the main design
influence on the Hittite stamp seals. The seal impression has imagery with
Mesopotamian themes and motifs. The double-headed eagles in each exhibit has
elongated necks and wide tails, with long, thin legs.[18]
“Bicephalous, or double-headed, images constitute a widely
distributed class of objects of great variety about whose primordial relationships
we know little.”[20] This is not the case in
the ancient Near East, where the class of objects showing the double-headed
eagle is much narrower, namely sculpture and seals, along with Hittite
monumental architecture. Recognizing that much of Mesopotamian culture
transmitted northwest from the southeast (Sumer) over time, and that the use of
the double-headed eagle followed the same route, the relationships of the
objects are generally understood, even if the meanings behind the iconography
are not.[21]
“And thou wilt mount upon the neck[s and wings] of the
eagle” (The Assumption of Moses 10:8). Notice the reference to the “necks”
(plural) of the eagle (singular). The 4 Ezra passage quoted at the beginning of
this chapter also mentions the two-headed bird; but then, one of its heads is
removed. We see this same pattern over time, with the double-headed insignia
used in the Old-World symbology of Eastern and Western Christianity. Whereas
modern crests typically feature a single-headed bird of prey. Amazingly, it
would appear that the Jewish sages were spot on in their understanding of
Israel’s enemies, which more appropriately are the enemies of the Holy One of
Israel.
What is revealed by this study of the Kingdom of Man?
·
World rulers have affiliated under a common
ideology; and this religious system is based upon myths and false deities.
·
The camaraderie of the world’s nations and
empires can be dated to nearly prehistoric times.
·
Wings, winged disks, and eagles have been used
as a subtle—seemingly harmless—means to show that an entity is under authority
(belonging to the king). Unfortunately, the king/deity of the world’s nations
is Satan, the “ruler of this world.”
·
Sufficient influence by the heathen nations, on
both Jewish and Christian leaders, is revealed by these religions’
incorporation of worldly bird symbols.
·
The infiltration of worldly/ungodly ideologies
has influenced Judaism from ancient times; and this fellowship with the Nations
persisted into the Post-Apostolic Early Church; and continues today.
Due to the reign of the “World Rulers” κοσμοκράτορας (kosmokratoras—Eph. 6:12) God has allowed
for nearly 2,000 years the false doctrines that Judah was forsaken and replaced
by a new chosen people, the Church; and more recently with Dispensationalism,
that Judah was cut off along with the House of Israel and must wait for the
“rapture of the Church.” The immediate response, though, of “the prince of the
power of the air”—Eph. 2:2—was to “sell” these doctrinal narratives to the
public by “scattering” Judah so that they, like the House of Israel, might lose
their identity; something that God has never done.
[1]
Time, “Separating Fact from Fiction:
Secret Societies Control the World”; retrieved 5/22/2021.
http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1860871_1860876_1861005,00.html
[2]
The Assumption of Moses translated from the Latin sixth century MS. by
R.H. Charles, M.A., Trinity College, Dublin, and Exeter College. Oxford,
London, Adam and Charles Black, 1897.
[3]
World History Encyclopedia,
https://www.worldhistory.org/image/13200/vulture-stone-gobekli-tepe.
[4]
Which Bird Cult? Andrew Collins,
http://www.andrewcollins.com/page/articles/sealed.htm, retrieved 5/21/2021.
[5]
“Experts crack mystery of ancient Egypt’s sacred bird mummies: DNA analysis
helps work out origin of nearly 6 million mummified ibises. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/nov/13/experts-crack-mystery-ancient-egypt-sacred-bird-mummies.
[6]
Ancient Origins.net, Mythical Benben Stone: The Landing Site of Egyptian God
Atum. https://www.ancient-origins.net/artifacts-other-artifacts/mythical-benben-stone-landing-site-egyptian-god-atum-006513,
Retrieved 5/21/2021.
[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winged_sun
[8]
Biblical Archaeology, “Who Were the
Hittites?” Ellen White, May 19, 2021;
https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/ancient-near-eastern-world/who-were-the-hittites
[9]
Deutsch, Robert (July–August 2002). “Lasting Impressions: New bullae reveal
Egyptian-style emblems on Judah’s royal seals”. Biblical Archaeology Review. 28 (4): 42–51. Retrieved 12 October
2014.
[10]
King Hezekiah in the Bible: Royal Seal of Hezekiah Comes to Light,
https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/king-hezekiah-in-the-bible-royal-seal-of-hezekiah-comes-to-light.
[11]
https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/what-the-hezekiah-seal-proves-jerusalem-status-1.5385544.
[12]
Na’aman, Nadav. “The lmlk seal impressions reconsidered.” Tel Aviv 43.1 (2016): 115.
[13]
https://www.netclipart.com/down/iixxbmx_coat-of-arms-with-eagle.
[14]
The Mesopotamian Origins of the Hittite
Double-Headed Eagle. Jesse D. Chariton, UW-L Journal of Undergraduate
Research XIV (2011).
[15]
www.heritagedaily.com/2020/09/yazilikaya-the-sanctuary-of-the-hittites/134949,
retrieved 7/17/2021.
[16]
Paul Williams Photographer Funky Stock Photos
[17]
Collon, Dominique. 1987 First Impressions: Cylinder Seals in the Ancient Near
East. The University of Chicago. Press, Chicago.
[18]
The Mesopotamian Origins of the Hittite
Double-Headed Eagle. Jesse D. Chariton, UW-L Journal of Undergraduate
Research XIV (2011).
[19]
Collon, Dominique. 1987 First
Impressions: Cylinder Seals in the Ancient Near East. The University of
Chicago, Press, Chicago.
[20]
Mundkur, Balaji, H.-G. Bandi, Stephen C. Jett, George Kubler, William Breen
Murray, and Charles R. Wicke 1984 The Bicephalous “Animal Style” in Northern
Eurasian Religious Art and Its Western Hemispheric Analogues. Current Anthropology 25(4): 451-482.
[21]
Jesse D. Chariton.